Factors associated with decision-making for replacing the temporary coronal restoration after endodontic treatment

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the decision-making by patients to replace temporary restorations with permanent restorations after endodontic treatment and to verify the associated factors and evaluate the quality/integrity of the temporary restorative material within one month. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using non-probabilistic sampling which analyzed patients after one month of endodontic treatment. The self-administered questionnaire contained sociodemographic, treatment decision-making and endodontic treatment questions. The restoration present in the mouth was evaluated in the clinical oral examination. The Poisson Regression test was used to verify the prevalence ratio. Results: The prevalence failure to perform permanent restorations was 61.1% of patients, and 42.7% reported not having adhered. The reasons are lack of time and not knowing the importance of replacing the restoration with a definitive one. The glass ionomer temporary restorative frequency was higher among those who chose not to replace the temporary restoration with a permanent one (PR=5.19; 95%CI 2.10-12.33). In addition, there was an association between the quality of the restorative material and the type of material, and the best clinical quality of the restoration was statistically associated with glass ionomer and composite resin. Conclusions: The findings show the importance of guidance by the dental surgeon in helping patients decide to replace their temporary restoration

Reporting characteristics of systematic review abstracts published in the proceedings of the SBPqO meeting

Aim: This study aimed to assess the reporting characteristics of systematic review abstracts published in the proceedings of the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) meeting. Methods: We selected abstracts published in the SBPqO meeting proceedings of 2019 and 2020, mentioning that a systematic review was conducted in the title, objective or methods sections. One researcher performed the screening and the data extraction after a pilot test training. The following data were extracted: affiliation of the primary author, dental specialization, the term "systematic review" mentioned in the title, reporting of the objective, reporting of eligibility criteria, reporting of information sources, reporting of the number of included studies and if a meta-analysis was performed. A descriptive analysis of the data was performed with data summarized as frequencies. Results: We included 235 abstracts. A total of 20 studies were from the Universidade de Uberlândia (8.5%), and the main specialization was Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry, with 47 studies (20%). Most of the studies mentioned the term "systematic review" in the title (n=219; 93.2%) and reported the objective (n=231; 98.3%). A great majority of studies did not report the eligibility criteria (n=97; 41.3%) or it was classified as unclear (n=96; 40.8%). The great majority of studies only reported the databases searched (n=103; 43.8%) or databases and date of search (n=74; 31.5%). Most of the studies reported the number of included studies (n=204; 86.8%). Conclusion: Based on this study, the reporting characteristics of systematic review abstracts published in the proceedings of the SBPqO meeting are satisfactory. However, there is room for improvement

Periodontitis and its associated factors in patients at the faculty of southern Brazil: a cross - sectional study

To verify the presence of periodontitis, its severity, and their association with associated factors based on medical records of patients who attended the Dental Clinic of the Faculty of Southern Brazil over 4 years. This is a cross-sectional study, which included 422 medical records of patients aged ≥ 18 years. The clinically analyzed data were: plaque index (PI),bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL). Sociodemographic data, dental hygiene, harmful habits and chronic systemic diseases were described. Statistical analysis of binary logistic regression was used to verify the relationship between the severity of periodontitis and the exposure variables. The older adults [odds ratio (OR) = 2.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-4.54 ­41 to 55 years and OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.49-6.09 ­56 to 87 years], and men (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.18-3.14) showed higher chances of periodontitis severity. Smokers (OR = 3.54; 95% CI: 2.05-6.12), those with hypertension (OR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.23-3.63) and with diabetes (OR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.08-4.12) showed higher chances of developing advanced periodontitis. Advanced or severe periodontitis occurred in one-third of the patients. The findings showed that men, older adults, with systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smokers are more susceptible to severe periodontitis.

How are meta-analyses being conducted and reported in dentistry? A meta-research study

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate how meta-analyses are conducted and reported in dentistry. Methods: We conducted a search to identify dentistry-related Systematic Reviews (SRs) indexed in PubMed in 2017 (from January 01 until December 31) and published in the English language. We included only SRs reporting at least one meta-analysis. The study selection followed the 4-phase flow set forth in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (PRISMA), and it was independently conducted by two researchers. Data extraction was performed by one of three reviewers, and data related to conducting and reporting of the meta-analysis were collected. Descriptive data analysis was performed summarizing frequencies for categorical items or median and interquartile range for continuous data. Results: We included 214 SRs with meta-analyses. Most of the studies reported in the title that a meta-analysis was conducted. We identified three critical flaws in the included studies: Ninety (90) meta-analyses (43.1%) did not specify the primary outcome; most of the meta-analyses reported that a measure of statistical heterogeneity was used to justify the use of a fixed-effect or random-effects meta-analysis model (n=114, 58.5%); and a great part did not assess publication bias (n=106, 49.5%). Conclusion: We identified deficiencies in the reporting and conduct of meta-analysis in dentistry, suggesting that there is room for improvement. Educational approaches are necessary to improve the quality of such analyses and to avoid biased and imprecise results

Influence of root canal preparation on formation of dentinal microcracks: a systematic review

Abstract The effect of root canal preparation technique on microcrack initiation is a controversial issue. This systematic review aimed to assess the role of root canal preparation techniques with different kinematics (manual, rotary, reciprocating, adaptive, self-adjusting file) on microcrack initiation. In vitro and in situ studies comparing the influence of at least two different root canal preparation techniques on the initiation of dentin microcracks were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE and SCOPUS up to June 5, 2018 without language and period restriction. Two authors independently reviewed all identified titles and abstracts for eligibility. Tables were generated to summarize the included studies, and the included studies were assessed for bias. Fifty-four (n=54) articles met the eligibility criteria. The results were classified according to the method used for microcrack evaluation, and most studies that used micro-computed tomography showed no formation of new cracks after root canal preparation. In general, the instrumentation techniques induced microcrack formation when the methods were destructive, irrespective of kinematics. In relation to the apex region, when the preparation working length was set as the root canal length subtracted of 1 mm, the risk of microcrack initiation reduces. The majority of the included studies had low risk of bias for all assessed domains. Our results seem to indicate that the various root canal preparation techniques considered in this study will not cause damage to the dental structure when adequately employed and the proper methodology is applied.

Resumo O efeito da técnica de preparo do canal radicular na iniciação e/ou propagação de microfissuras dentinárias é um tema controverso. Essa revisão sistemática teve como objetivo avaliar o papel das técnicas de preparo do canal radicular com diferentes cinemáticas (manual, rotatória, reciprocante, adaptativa e self-adjusting file) na iniciação e/ou propagação de microfissuras dentinárias. Estudos in vitro e in situ comparando a influência de pelo menos duas técnicas diferentes de preparo do canal radicular foram identificados no PubMed/MEDLINE e SCOPUS até 05 de junho de 2018 sem restrição de idioma e tempo. Dois autores revisaram de maneira independente todos títulos e resumos para elegibilidade dos estudos. Tabelas foram criadas para sumarizar os estudos incluídos e os estudos foram avaliados quanto ao risco de viés. Cinquenta e quatro (54) estudos enquadraram-se nos critérios de elegibilidade. Os resultados foram classificados de acordo com o método utilizado para avaliação das microfissuras. A maioria dos estudos que utilizaram micro-tomografia não demonstraram formação de novas microfissuras após preparo do canal radicular. Em geral, técnicas de instrumentação induziram formação de microfissuras quando os métodos de avaliação foram destrutivos, independente da cinemática. Em relação a região do ápice, quando comprimento de trabalho foi definido como o comprimento do canal menos 1 mm, o risco de indução de microfissuras é reduzido. A maioria dos estudos incluídos apresentaram baixo risco de viés para todos os domínios apresentados. Nossos resultados parecem indicar que as diferentes técnicas de preparo do canal radicular não causam danos a estrutura dental quando adequadamente utilizadas e a metodologia adequada é utilizada.

Patients' perception about the outcomes of prosthetic treatment in Southern Brazil - a cross sectional study

Aim: this study assessed the patients' perception of the outcomes of prosthetic treatment in a University of Southern Brazil. Methods: patients seeking for prosthetic treatment were invited to answer a questionnaire with 41 items about the potential risks, benefits, and consequences of no treatment. Answers were obtained according to a five-item Likert-scale varying from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Sociodemographic data was included in the comparison. Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis (95%) compared data depending on the variable. Results: two-hundred twenty-five patients answered the questionnaire. Median age of participants was 45-54 years. The potential benefits were similar among participants irrespective of the variable adopted. The perception of risks was significant influenced by variables gender, age, education level, type of edentulous space, prior treatment with prosthodontics, type of prosthodontics, and prosthodontics usage in years. Consequences of no treatment were affected by age, prior treatment with prosthodontics, and prosthodontics usage in years. Conclusions: the study showed the fundamental importance of correct elucidation about the potential risks (negative perception) in the initial appointment for the studied population. Elucidation about the consequences of no treatment are relevant because some differences were seen into the variables. Prosthodontics patients from the city of Passo Fundo seem well informed about the benefits of the prosthetic treatment, besides the significant influence of some sociodemographic and prosthetic conditions

Tendências da força de trabalho de cirurgiões-dentistas no Brasil, no período de 2007 a 2014: estudo de séries temporais com dados do Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde / Tendencias en la fuerza laboral de dentistas en Brasil nel periodo del 2007 al 2014: estudio de series temporales con datos del Registro Nacional de Servicios de Salud / Trends in the dental surgeon workforce in Brazil 2007-2014: a time series study using data from the National Registry of Health Services

Objetivo: analisar as tendências da força de trabalho de cirurgiões-dentistas no Brasil, no período de 2007 a 2014. Métodos: estudo de séries temporais com dados do Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde (CNES) e da Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE); regressões lineares generalizadas de Prais-Winstein foram utilizadas para estimar as tendências temporais e calcular a variação percentual anual da força de trabalho de cirurgiões-dentistas no período estudado. Resultados: houve crescimento do número de cirurgiões-dentistas atuando como clínicos gerais e especialistas, em média 12,7% e 17,3% ao ano, respectivamente; a expansão da força de trabalho de clínico geral (0,5%) e de especialista (11,6%) foi menor no setor público, em relação ao setor privado (24,5% e 30,3%, respectivamente). Conclusão: o número de cirurgiões-dentistas é elevado, embora estejam desigualmente distribuídos em ambos setores de atuação, o que pode implicar barreiras no acesso aos cuidados odontológicos no Brasil.

Objetivo: fue analisar las tendencias de la fuerza laboral de dentistas en Brasil, entre 2007 y 2014. Métodos: estudios de Series Temporales con datos nacionales del Registro Nacional de Establecimientos de Salud y del Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística fueron analizados; regresiones lineares generalizadas de Prais-Winstein fueron utilizadas para estimar las tendencias en el tiempo y calcular el cambio porcentual anual de la fuerza de trabajo de los dentistas durante el período. Resultados: el número de dentistas que actúa como generalistas y especialistas creció al año en promedio de 12,7% y 17,3%, secuencialmente; la expansión de la mano de obra de dentistas generalistas (0,5%) y especialistas (11,6%) fue menor en sector público e comparado con el privado (24,5% e 30,3%, respectivamente). Conclusión: el numero de dentistas en Brasil es elevado, entretanto, están desigualmente distribuidos, lo que puede implicar barreras en el acesso a los cuidados odontológicos en Brasil.

Objective: the objective was to analyze trends in the dental surgeon workforce in Brazil between 2007 and 2014. Methods: this is a time series study using data from the Brazilian National Register of Health Establishments and the Brazilian National Institute of Geography and Statistics. Prais-Winsten generalized linear regression was used to estimate time trends and to calculate the annual percent change in the dental surgeon workforce over the period. Results: the number of dental surgeons working as general practitioners and as specialists grew on average by 12.7% and 17.3% per annum, respectively; dental surgeon workforce expansion in relation to general practitioners (0.5%) and specialists (11.6%) was lower in the public sector, compared to the private sector (24.5% and 30.3%, respectively). Conclusion: the number of dental surgeons in Brazil is high, although they are not equally distributed between both sectors. This may imply barriers to dental care access in Brazil.